report of the (67) of the boycott department in the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine: Boycott Campaigns on Universal Declaration of Human Rights Day

Report of the (67) of the boycott department in the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine: Boycott Campaigns on Universal Declaration of Human Rights Day

The boycott campaigns valued the decision of the Kuwaiti Minister of Works, "Rana Fares", to prevent the entry of ships loaded with goods to and from the Israeli occupation state.

Also, activists in the boycott campaigns valued the revival by some activists in Morocco of the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, in support of the rights of the Palestinian people and a rejection of normalization with the Israeli occupying state.

Meanwhile, activists in the boycott campaigns condemned the signing of a cooperation agreement by the Israeli Football Association with the Royal Football League in Morocco, in the presence of the head of the Israeli Liaison Office in Morocco, "David Govrin".

In turn, activists with boycott campaigns renewed the demonstrations in Jordan, rejecting normalization with the Israeli occupation state, and in support of the Palestinian cause and Palestinian national rights.

Activists in the boycott campaigns also valued the decision of the Jordanian Engineers Association to form a committee to confront the "declaration of intent" signed between Jordan and the Israeli occupation state.

Activists in the boycott campaigns condemned the selection of the Jordanian movie "Princess" to be represented in the Oscar, because of its attempt to distort the issue of human prisoners, and their real suffering in front of public opinion.

Meanwhile, activists in the boycott campaigns condemned the participation of the Lebanese band "Adonis" in the Arab World Institute in Paris, due to the institute's cultural normalization with the Museum of "Israel" and the Israeli "Ben Zvi" Foundation.

Activists in the boycott campaigns valued the statement of the Malaysian government advisor after his country's position on preventing participants from the Israeli occupation state from entering the squash game, saying that it is a sovereign issue.

On the other hand, the boycott movement in Denmark organized a vigil in "Copenhagen" to demand the "Irma" store to boycott the goods of the illegal Israeli settlements.

In the same context, activists in the boycott campaigns valued the British court’s decision, which ruled in favor of the Palestine movement, and considered that what the Palestine movement is doing represents freedom of opinion and expression, after the “elbit system” company filed a lawsuit against it for defamation and defamation of the company.